TRATAMENT SAU VINDECARE ?

Atunci cand suntem bolnavi, cautam sa scapam urgent de starea de boala cu tot ce poate insemna ea: durere, ameteti, crampe, temperatura, varsaturi, manifestari cutanate etc si apelam la un tratament rapid. Dar in bolile cronice lipseste acest tratament 100% eficient si lipsit de riscuri, reactii adverse sau recidive. De fapt, din cele 12420 de categorii de boli catalogate de World Health Organization, medicina moderna nu a reusit sa eradicheze decat DOUA: variola si pesta bovina (2001).

Daca esti intr-un moment delicat pentru sanatatea ta si vrei sa iei RAPID cea mai BUNA decizie, atunci OPRESTE-TE SI CITESTE ! PRIMA ALEGERE este sa te informezi asupra CAUZELOR problemei de sanatate, asupra stadiului de boala si a modului in care raspunde organismul tau, si, desigur, asupra OPTIUNILOR DE TRATAMENT si a RISCURILOR lor:

TRATAMENT ALOPAT
TRATAMENT NATURIST TRADITIONAL
TERAPIE ENERGETICA MODERNA

A. TRATATAMENTUL ALOPAT

Tratamentul alopat este suma procedurilor medicale menite sa elimine, sa controleze sau sa mascheze simptomele bolii. Exista trei tipuri de tratamente alopate: medicamente, radiatie si operatie, fiecare cu specificul si efectele sale adverse. Tratamentul este obligatoriu in cazul situatiilor clasificate ca urgente medicale: accidente, traume, infectii grave etc, dar el este mai putin eficient in cazul bolilor cronice deoarece adreseaza doar simptomele, si NU cauzele bolii.

.

RISCURI MEDICAMENTE

Ele adreseaza un proces (ex: scaderea colesterolului) / un organ / o boala, au multe efecte adverse iar tratamentul unei disfunctii complexe implica combinarea mai multor medicamente cu efecte secundare necontrolabile pe termen lung : astfel un medicament are reactii adverse in 15% din cazuri, doua medicamente – in 42% din cazuri, trei medicamente – in 92 % din cazuri iar 4 medicamente au reactii adverse in 98% din cazuri.

ex: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/four-drugs-cause-most-hospitalizations-in-older-adults/

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/169

RISCURI COMPLICATII OPERATIE

(1) Fibrom uterin:

sangerare excesiva (incidenta mai mare in laparoscopie), slabirea uterului si risc rupere in sarcina (mai mult in laparoscopie), dezvoltarea aderentelor (incidenta mai mare in laparoscopie), infectie, afectarea intestinului / vezicii urinare (incidenta mai mare in laparoscopie), complicatii la ovare cu afectarea fertilitatii !!! ( in laparoscopie – “One study reported some ovarian damage in more than half of women with this procedure. In one study, menstruation stopped in 1% to 7% of women under 40.”) . Cu cat fibromul este mai mare, cu atat riscul de a dezvolta complicatii este mai mare – de obicei in sistemele medicale avansate se face un tratament hormonal inainte de operatie care sa reduca fibromul cu 40-60% si abia apoi se opereaza!!!

(Ref: http://adam.about.net/reports/000073_9.htm si http://www.umfiasi.ro/ScoalaDoctorala/TezeDoctorat/Teze%20Doctorat/Rezumat_pintilie.pdf)

+ trauma (efecte sistem imunitar) + risc recidiva !

studiu complicatii laparoscopie 400 femei: “There were ten in-hospital complications and an additional 27 complications within the first 30 days, with 34 patients experiencing a periprocedural complication for a rate of 8.5%. There were five serious complications (SCVIR class D), comprising 1.25% of the study group. Using ACOG definitions for perioperative complications, the overall morbidity was 5%.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029784402023414 http://www.fibroid.com/ufe-risks-benefits/

(2) Riscuri scoatere ovare

“What we showed is that for the surgery to be a risk factor, it has to be done before menopause. If before age 46 you remove two ovaries, you get a 70 percent increased risk of dementia. And we discovered that women who have only one ovary removed before age 38 — this is a surgery more often done in younger women — we see a 260 percent increase in dementia. That is quite a dramatic and somewhat unexpected finding” (Walter Rocca).

(3) Fibroadenom

“Complications from fibroadenomas are not uncommon. Biopsies and fibroadenoma removal, like all surgical procedures, carry the risk of bleeding, scarring, and post-operative infection. After the breast fibroadenoma is removed, it is not unusual for a new fibroadenoma to grow in the same location.” http://www.women-health-info.com/288-Breast-fibroadenoma.html

(4) Adenom prostata

“O problema poate fi sangerarea masiva din timpul operatiei. Sangerarea mai mica poate fi stopata cu ajutorul manipulatorului electric, in cazul unei sangerari mai mari insa interventia poate fi continuata prin deschiderea abdomenului. Dupa realizarea interventiei, exista riscul de infectie, formarea de puroi. In cazul rezectiei pregatite corespunzator, sub tratament cu antibiotice riscul poate fi evitat. Cicatrizarea din zona rezectiei poate cauza o noua ingustare. Marirea prostatei poate recidiva odata cu inaintarea in varsta. In ambele cazuri este nevoie de repetarea interventiei chirurgicale. Daca interventia chirurgicala nu poate fi repetata, se va efectua in masura posibilului prin deschiderea abdomenului.” – http://www.sfaturimedicale.ro/rezectia-transuretrala-a-prostatei.html

EFICACITATE / EFECTE RADIOTERAPIE:

Radiatia ionizanta cu doze scazute stimuleaza cresterea tumorilor si metastazele prin stimularea angiogenezei: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20574535

Recurenta cancer:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12852471 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20117289

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10584565 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8625126

Radioterapia in cazul cancerului la sani neoperat determina aparitia recurentei tumorilor in cca 7% din cazuri – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21411324
Radioterapia creste riscul de cancer la sani, plamani etc (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930978 ; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8411245 ; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9254734 ), mai ales in cazul fumatoarelor (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16234513 )
Radioterapia cu iod131 in ablatia cancerului tiroidian esueaza in 52,4% din cazuri – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14722676
Radiatia impreuna cu procedurile chirurgicale pentru ulcerul gastric cresc riscul de cancer stomacal de 10 ori: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8182765

Efecte adverse : boli de inima – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752480

RECIDIVA AFECTIUNE DUPA OPERATIE

AFECTIUNI FEMININE

Cca 45-55% dintre femeile operate de afectiuni feminine, fac recidiva in interval de pana la 5 ani; riscul de recurenta este mai mare pentru femeile cu greutate corporala crescuta.

(1) FIBROM

recidiva dupa 5 ani : ” Up to 50% of fibroids have grown back within 10 years of removal by myomectomy” – Wallach E, Vlahos NF (2004). Uterine myomas: An overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104(2): 393–406
studiu caz 1: 125 femei operate din care o treime cu o singura tumoare – recidiva (re-operatie) in 11% din cazuri; doua treimi din femei au vut multiple tumori – recidiva 26% din cazuri – “Myomectomy: Recurrence after Removal of Solitary and Multiple Myomas” – MALONE, LAWRENCE J. MD, FACOG -

http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/1969/08000/Myomectomy__Recurrence_after_Removal_of_Solitary.10.aspx

studiu caz 2: 81 femei, 17,5% recidiva la doi ani si jumatate – se considera ca recidivele apar majoritar dupa 2 ani – “Predictive factors for fibroids recurrence after uterine artery embolisation” – Henri Marret, Jean Philippe Cottier, Ana Maria Alonso, Bruno Giraudeau, Gilles Body, Denis Herbreteau -

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00487.x/abstract

studiu caz 3: 81 de femei, urmarite 40 luni – operate laparoscopic sau clasic. Recidiva fibroame > 1 cm au aparut la 27% din femeile operate laparoscopic,
comparativ cu 23% din femeile operate clasic. Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Soranna L, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic myomectomy: recurrence rate in comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2001;16:770-774
studiu recidiva comparativ laparoscopie – operatie clasica: ” In a recent study conducted by researchers with the University of California, Los Angeles, however, 30 percent of UAE patients, who were followed for three years, needed additional fibroid treatment, with only 3 percent of patients who had fibroids removed surgically requiring further treatment “- http://news.injuryboard.com/fibroid-surgery-may.aspx?googleid=27480
studiu global: “Recurrent Fibroids – A Retrospective Study” – Bava Amarjeet Kaur, YS Nandanwar

- The recurrence rate of fibroids after removal or after a previous surgery varies between 25-62% by the end of five years follow up. Nearly 10-20% patients need a second surgery within 1 to 10 years

- Recurrences of fibroids with symptoms depend on patient’s age and the onset of menopause.

- Around 11-26% of recurrence cases need additional treatment

- studiu 35 paciente din care 16 au avut complicatii – 45,7% !!! din care 7 cu complicatii la intestin, 3 la vezica urinara si 4 cu pierderi de sange

(2) ENDOMETRIOZA:

a) “Laparoscopic Excision of Endometrioma” NadaAbid Al-Hur Al Ebrahimi, Iraq (recurenta aprox 20% la 5 ani, recurenta 30,4% la 2 ani pt chist endometrial) – http://worldjls.org/Journal/vol/vol2/12.pdf -

b) “Recurrent endometriosis: incidence, management, and prognosis” (recurenta 13.5% si 40.3% la 3, respectiv 5 ani) – Wheeler JM, Malinak LR.; Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jun 1;146(3):247-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6859132

c) “Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis: multivariate analysis of predictive factors for recurrence of endometriotic lesions and pain” (recurenta in 18,4% din cazuri ) Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Palagiano A, Scarselli G.; University of Florence, Italy; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481523

d) “Pain and ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis: a long-term prospective study” (recurenta 9,6% la 3ani)- Maria Grazia Porpora, Debora Pallante, Annamaria Ferro, Brenda Crisafi, Filippo Bellati, Pierluigi B. Panici; Fertility and Sterility, Vol.93, Issue3, Pag.716-721; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19061997

e) “Recurrent umbilical endometriosis after laparoscopic treatment of minimal pelvic endometriosis: a case report” – Goldberg JM, Bedaiwy MA. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17694981

f) “The optimal management of endometriosis remains controversial” – N.T. Matebese – http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6811/is_10_27/ai_n42124090/?tag=content;col1

g) “A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications” – Härkki-Sirén P, Kurki T. Espoo, Finland. – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8990449

(3) CANCER SAN

intre 10-30% din femeile operate vor face o noua tumoare in zona:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687148 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20653987

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20158881 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21463502

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8007020 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19201045

(4) CHIST OVARIAN
(a) laparoscopie pentru chist ovarian: – la doar doi ani !:

chist endometrial

– recurenta 7,1% la doi ani, repetarea operatie in 3,3% din cazuri si rezultate la 4 ani: 11,7% pentru o singura operatie, 8,2% dupa a doua operatie http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10076121

- recurenta 29% la doi ani fara anticonceptionale, si 14,7% cu anticonceptionale postoperatoriu:

chist dermoid: recurenta 7,6% la doi ani – http://www.sogc.org/jogc/abstracts/full/200609_Gynaecology_1.pdf

(b) anticonceptionalele si ovarele: risc chisturi si neoplasm: : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11560246 dar si alte riscuri

AFECTIUNI MASCULINE

Adenom de prostata:

necesar re-operatie (prostatectomie deschisa) la 8 ani: 4,5-7% , iar in cazul rezectiei transuretrale a prostatei (TURP) riscul de recurenta la 8 ani este 15,5-16,8% – “Is Complete Resection of Hypertrophic Adenoma of the Prostate Possible with TURP ?” – Yuji Shimizu, Yasunori Hiraoka, Kazuya Iwamoto, Hirofumi Takahashi etc, Tama Nagayama Hospital, Nippon Medical School - http://www.nms.ac.jp/jnms/2005/072030146.pdf

studiu 577 pacienti urmariti 10 ani: “Repeat operation had to be performed in 35 patients (6%). TUR for bladder neck contracture had to be done in 14 patients (2.4%), while repeat TURP for BPH obstruction was required in 11 patients (1.9%). Finally, urethral strictures mandating surgical correction were present in 10 patients (1.7%).” http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/14743463
studiu 128 pacienti, din care 20 diabetici: “The incidence of a second TURP was higher in diabetics (25% vs.7.8%, p = 0.033). Although not statistically significant, a higher incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED) in diabetic patients (37.5% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.073) was observed” – “Long-term outcome of Trans Urethral Prostatectomy in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with and without diabetes mellitus” – Mohammad Soleimani,Seyed Yousef Hoseini,Majid Aliasgari,Farid Dadkhah,Alireza Lashay,Erfan Amini - Shahid Beheshti University, M.C. (SBMU) , Iran – http://www.jpma.org.pk/full_article_text.php?article_id=1921
” The 5-year risk rate for a reoperation following TURP is approximately 5%” – http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/449781-overview

Cancer prostata:

cancere secundare dupa iradierea pentru cancer prostata:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22513891 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1931775

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10660197 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6409407

ALTE AFECTIUNI

Adenom pituitara

“In a series of 32 patients, only 2 (6.2%) with gross total tumor removal and no postoperative radiation therapy showed radiological recurrence of the tumor at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years” – http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/pituitary/HealthProfessional/page4

Adenom colon

studiu pe 760 pacienti, dintre care 50% cu exces greutate si 25% obezi - Adeyinka Laiyemo, MD, MPH, Howard University in Washington
“obese patients had a 20% increased risk of adenoma recurrence within 12 years”
Overweight patients had a 23% increased risk of any adenoma (95% CI 1.03 to 1.46) and an 18% increased risk of advanced adenoma within four years, although the latter was not significant.
Within 12 years, these patients had an 18% increased risk for any adenoma (95% CI 1.02 to 1.36). A 14% increased risk of advanced adenoma was not significant.
Obese patients had a borderline significant 19% increased risk of any adenoma within four years. A 23% increased risk of advanced adenoma during that time was not significant.

COMPLICATII COLECISTECTOMIE (operatie scoatere bila):

cresterea continua a fluxului biliar in tractul digestiv superior, care poate contribui la esofagita si gastrita
scurgerea bilei catre pancreas -> pancreatita (5% din cazuri) -> intoleranta la alimentele grase, balonarea etc
scurgerea bilei in intestinul subtire -> cca 20% din persoanele operate sufera de diaree sau sindromul colonului iritabil
aderente operatie -> inflamatie, durere in zona operatiei

DE CE APARE ACEST NUMAR IMPRESIONANT DE EFECTE ADVERSE SI RECIDIVE ?

Iata un raspuns surprinzator : “If it is science that is required then surely professor Colquhoun needs to address the fact that, according to the British Medical Journal, only 15% of the conventional (orthodox) medicines and medical procedures in use today have ever been scientifically tested.” Jayney Goddard, president of the Complementary Medicine Association, 2007

Dupa opinia noastra, adevaratul raspuns este acela ca tratamentul alopat adreseaza doar planul fizic : doar 2% din organismul nostru, in timp ce componenta energetico-informationala ramane neacoperita, generand complicatii si recidive ale bolii.

B. TRATAMENT NATURIST

Naturopatia este un sistem medical complet si coerent care lucreaza plecand de la principiul ca organismul are o capablitate intrinseca si innascuta de a se vindeca, iar pentru vindecare trebuie stimulate mecanismele naturale de autovindecare a corpului si restabilite functiile normale ale tesuturilor si organelor afectate. Principiile si metodele de vindecare sunt specifice fiecarui sistem medical:

din medicina traditionala (evidenced-based medicine): medicina traditionala chineza, ayurveda, homeopatie, herbalism, reflexologie, terapie craniosacrala, terapie Bowen etc – dezavantaje: lipsa diagnosticului obiectiv, incapacitate de a gestiona bolile produse de incarcatura toxica a omului modern (electrosmog, metale toxice, aditivi alimentari, derivati petrol, dioxina, PCB, DDE etc), manipulare energetica redusa (pana la 1600 Hz si numai anumite sisteme) etc
din medicina stiintifica (science-based medicine): medicina functionala, medicina biologica, medicina metabolica etc

Aproape toate sistemele de medicina stiintifica folosesc logica liniara: cauza -> efect -> organ si urmaresc intarirea mecanismelor naturale de autoreglare si vindecare din corpul uman, mecanisme ignorate de medicina alopata. Ele pun accent pe preventia bolilor si urmaresc vindecarea organismului in ansamblu, tinand seama de variatiile individuale: tipul constitutional, metabolic etc.

Exista cateva terapii traditionale (iridologia, auriculoterapia, reflexologia – presopunctura, acupunctura) care nu adreseaza direct un organ, ci PROIECTIA acestuia in zone ce cuprind microharti ale corpului (ochi, urechi, maini, picioare, scalp etc). Aceste terapii, vechi de peste 5000 de ani, sunt verificate in practica.

De asemenea exista vindecare la distanta, vindecare prin credinta / meditatie (ex. Reiki), vindecarea spontana etc – toate probate practic, care nu tin seama de modelul liniar (newtonian) al corpului uman si al realitatii, ci de o realitate mai complexa, ordonata in care omul este parte distincta, dar strans interconectata la nivel informational si energetic – ceea ce am putea defini ca modelul holografic.

C. TERAPIE INFO-ENERGETICA

In medicina informationalo-energetica (= post-newtoniana, cuantica, oscilatorie / ondulatorie / vibrationala) se urmareste vindecarea la nivelul biohologramei cuantice umane, prin manipularea biocampului, repararea ADN-ului, resetarea memoriei celulare, modificarea frecventei de oscilatie etc.

Exista extrem de putine dispozitive care pot oferi informatii la nivel macro / micro; de obicei terapia la nivel energetic implica lucrul cu stimuli care amplifica perturbatia generata de boala pentru a forta organismul neresponsiv (adaptare sau epuizare pe scara Seyle) sa raspunda si sa-si re-organizeze Biocampul cf. neg-entropiei (auto-organizarea = entropiei negativa sistemelor biologice). Efectele terapiilor sunt subtile (aproape insesizabile pe moment) si cumulative. In general se lucreaza prin modificarea campului electromagnetic (plan energetic), dar si cu terapii ce adreseaza planurile mental, emotional si spiritual: biofeedback & neurofeedback, NLP, neuroimagerie, VKPD (Anuashvili) / BiFace (Nelson) , terapia hololingvistica, terapia prin culoare, aromaterapie etc. Dincolo de manipularea Biocampului, se mai poate lucra pe planul fizic prin detoxifiere si regenerare la nivel de microsistem (medicina celulara, moleculara si ortomoleculara).

Natura proiectat corpul uman ca un unic sistem cu auto-organizare, atat de complex incat medicina alopata, care trateaza doar simptomele bolii, este în mod frecvent în imposibilitatea de a vindeca organismul. Medicina cuantica tine seama de postulatul de Integritate a Naturii: Macro – OM - Micro, si lucreaza atat la nivel micro (celular), cat si la nivel macro – planurile mental, emotional si spiritual deoarece dezvoltarea / functionarea intregului organism ne arata ca psihologia, functiile cognitiva si relationala, intuitia, experientele spirituale etc nu pot fi separate de biologie si reciproc: – celulele noastre “asculta” la gandurile noastre si de frecventele exterioare - si sunt schimbate de catre acestea.

CONCLUZII

Fiecare persoana trebuie sa aleaga constient si liber de orice presiune tipul de tratament care i se potriveste. In cazul bolilor grave, este posibil si recomandabil sa se combine tratamentul alopat cu terapia naturista pentru a maximiza sansele si/sau a spori calitatea vietii pacientului.